Washington, August 7, 2026 (Yes Punjab News)
US Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation seeking to prevent the implementation of the Trump administration’s new “public charge” immigration rule, arguing that the policy could discourage immigrant families from accessing essential healthcare, food assistance and housing support.
Representative Judy Chu and Senator Mazie Hirono introduced the Protect American Values Act ahead of the rule’s scheduled implementation on September 18. Indian American lawmakers Pramila Jayapal and Raja Krishnamoorthi are among more than 50 House members supporting the proposed legislation.
The bill seeks to block federal funds from being used to implement, administer, enforce or carry out the new rule, which could make it more difficult for certain immigrants who receive government benefits to obtain green cards or adjust their immigration status.
Under the “public charge” test, immigration authorities assess whether an individual is likely to become primarily dependent on government assistance while considering applications for admission to the United States or lawful permanent residency.
The Trump administration’s rule replaces a 2022 policy introduced during the Biden administration, which had excluded non-cash benefits such as Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and housing assistance from public charge evaluations.
Critics have raised concerns that the new rule does not clearly define which benefits may be considered, potentially giving immigration officers broad discretion in evaluating applications.
“Donald Trump is once again weaponizing our immigration system against families who are simply trying to build better lives in America,” Chu said.
She added that unlike the previous policy, the new regulation does not provide clear standards on which benefits could affect immigration decisions, leaving applicants vulnerable to subjective judgments.
The revised rule also removes protections that prevented immigration officers from considering benefits used by an immigrant’s family members. Opponents argue this could discourage people in mixed-status households from seeking assistance even when they are legally eligible.
Hirono said the lack of clarity could create widespread fear among immigrant communities.
“By removing any guidance for what qualifies as ‘public charge’, the Trump administration’s rule creates fear and prevents immigrants and their families from accessing services they need—even if they are still entitled to them,” she said.
The legislation has received support from more than 100 organisations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, the National Immigration Law Center, Stop AAPI Hate and the National Women’s Law Center Action Fund.
Wendy Cervantes of the Center for Law and Social Policy said uncertainty over immigration consequences often leads eligible families to avoid essential government programmes.
The concept of “public charge” has existed in US immigration law for decades and allows authorities to deny admission or permanent residency in certain cases where an applicant is considered likely to rely primarily on public assistance.
FOLLOW NOW
